Tiamulin hydrogen fumarate |
![]() Last updated: 12/09/2025 |
![]() |
(Also known as: tiamulin fumarate; dynamutilin ) |
|
![]() |
|
A semi-synthetic derivative of pleuromutilin active against gram-positive bacteria, mycoplasmas, and anaerobes | |
---|---|---|
|
Used in the treatment of dysentery, enzootic pneumonia and mycoplasmal infections | |
|
Pigs; Chicken; Turkeys |
Approval status |
|
Not approved | |
---|---|---|
|
Not approved |
Chemical structure |
|
Tiamulin hydrogen fumarate exhibits stereoisomerism due to its complex, chiral structure derived from the pleuromutilin class of antibiotics. The tiamulin molecule contains multiple stereocentres, particularly within its rigid tricyclic diterpene core and the side chains, which give rise to diastereomers. The fumarate component also contributes geometric (E/Z) isomerism, as it exists in the (E)-but-2-enedioic acid form, meaning the two carboxylic acid groups are on opposite sides of the double bond. | |
---|---|---|
|
C₃₂H₅₁NO₈S | |
|
CCN(CC)CCSCC(=O)OC1CC(C(C(C23CCC(C1(C2C(=O)CC3)C)C)C)O)(C)C=C.C(=CC(=O)O)C(=O)O | |
|
CCN(CC)CCSCC(=O)O[C@@H]1C[C@@]([C@H]([C@@H](C23CC[C@H](C1([C@H]2C(=O)CC3)C)C)C)O)(C)C=C.C(=C/C(=O)O)\C(=O)O | |
|
YXQXDXAHCSEVSD-QETAFFDQSA-N | |
|
InChI=1S/C28H47NO4S.C4H4O4/c1-8-26(6)17-22(33-23(31)18-34-16-15-29(9-2)10-3)27(7)19(4)11-13-28(20(5)25(26)32)14-12-21(30)24(27)28;5-3(6)1-2-4(7)8/h8,19-20,22,24-25,32H,1,9-18H2,2-7H3;1-2H,(H,5,6)(H,7,8)/b;2-1+/t19-,20+,22-,24+,25+,26-,27-,28+;/m1./s1 | |
|
Yes |
General status |
|
Antibiotic, Antimicrobial, Antibacterial, Feed Additive | |
---|---|---|
|
Pleuromutilin | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
Synthetic | |
|
Inhibition of ribosomal protein synthesis in sensitive bacteria | |
|
[50S rRNA, Antagonist] | |
|
55297-96-6 | |
|
259-581-6 | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
86280312 | |
|
Antiinfectants for systemic use: Antibacterials for systemic use | |
|
QJ01XQ01 | |
|
No | |
|
Allowed substance (Table 1: Porcine, Chicken, Turkey, Rabbit) | |
|
609.82 | |
|
- | |
|
(E)-but-2-enedioic acid;[(1S,2R,3S,4S,6R,7S,8R,14R)-4-ethenyl-3-hydroxy-2,4,7,14-tetramethyl-9-oxo-6-tricyclo[5.4.3.01,8]tetradecanyl] 2-[2-(diethylamino)ethylsulfanyl]acetate | |
|
14-deoxy-14-((2-diethylaminoethyl)-mercaptoacetoxy)-mutilin | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
White to yellow coloured crystalline powder |
Commercial |
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- | |||
|
early-1980s, first registrations | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Available as a medicated feed pre-mix or oral concentrations | |||
|
Tiamulin hydrogen fumarate is produced through a semi-synthetic process that begins with the extraction of pleuromutilin, a diterpene antibiotic derived from the fermentation of the fungus Clitopilus passeckerianus. Once isolated, pleuromutilin undergoes chemical modification, starting with acetylation using acetic anhydride in the presence of a catalyst to alter its functional groups and enhance its pharmacological properties. This intermediate is then reacted with diethylaminoethyl thiol to introduce the side chain responsible for tiamulin’s antibacterial activity. Finally, the tiamulin base is combined with fumaric acid to form the stable salt, tiamulin hydrogen fumarate, which improves solubility and bioavailability for veterinary applications. | |||
|
As microbial-based products tend to use fermentation-based production processes rather than chemical synthesis, they typically have a lower fossil fuel input in formulation and active ingredient creation, and also have reduced downstream emissions due to biodegradability and minimal soil disruption, their life-cycle GHG emissions are expected to be low. Whilst hard and precise data is not available, broad estimates suggest that typically emissions are likely to be below 5 kg CO₂e/kg. However, the semi-synthetic nature of the production process for this substance is likely to increase emissions. |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
147 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
1.26 X 1002 | Calculated | - | |||||||
|
2.1 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
Not applicable | R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications 4 = Verified data |
- | ||||||||
No dissociation | |||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
Substance may enter the environment via the urine faeces of treated animals or by leaching from spilt medicated feed. |
Degradation |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
106.5 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
Persistent | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
USEPA data: lab studt DT₅₀ range 43-301 days, Soils=8 | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. | ||||||||||
|
- |
Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- |
Fate indices |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- | - |
Known metabolites |
None
|
![]() |
Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
841 | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) Mouse3 = Unverified data of known source |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | |||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 1860 | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) Gallus domesticus3 = Unverified data of known source |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - |
Aquatic ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.2 | R3 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications Unknown species3 = Unverified data of known source |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
32 | R3 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications Daphnia magna3 = Unverified data of known source |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 0.165 | R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications Raphidocelis subcapitata4 = Verified data |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - |
|
- | - | - | |||
|
- | - | - |
|
![]() |
General |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
High (class III) | - | - | ||||||||
|
841 | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) Mouse3 = Unverified data of known source |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
Subcutaneous LD₅₀ = 521 mg kg⁻¹ | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) Mouse3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | |||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
Following absorption, it is rapidly metabolised and excreted | A5 A = EU regulatory and evaluation data as published by EC, EFSA (RAR, DAR & Conclusion dossiers), EMA (e.g. EU Annex III PIC DGD) (EU - Pesticides database; EFSA Scientific Publications ) 5 = Verified data used for regulatory purposes |
- |
Health issues |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May cause dermatitis or asthma Possible liver and kidney toxicant |
Handling issues |
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Emits toxic fumes under fire conditions | |||
|
- | |||
|
Not listed (Not listed) | |||
|
- | |||
|
- | |||
|
- |
|
![]() |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|
|
tiamulin hydrogen fumarate | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- |
Record last updated: | 12/09/2025 |
Contact: | aeru@herts.ac.uk |
Please cite as: | Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |