Bacillus pumilus strain QST 2808 |

Last updated: 25/08/2025
|
 |
(Not known by any other names) |
The following alerts are based on the data in the tables below. An absence of an alert does not imply the substance has no implications for human health, biodiversity or the environment but just that we do not have the data to form a judgement. These hazard alerts do not take account of usage patterns or exposure, thus do not represent risk.
Environmental fate |
Ecotoxicity |
Human health |
  |
  |
|
|
A gram-positive bacterium used to control a wide variety of plant fungal diseases |
|
molds; Mildews; Blights; Rusts and Phytophthora ramorum which is the oomycete that causes sudden oak death syndrome |
|
Many food and non-food crops; Trees; Ornamentals |
|
- |
|
Cells are 3.5-5 um long and around 1.5um thick and opaque in colour. |
|
Class: Bacilli; Order: Bacillales; Family: Bacillaceae |
EC Regulation 1107/2009 (repealing 91/414) |
|
Not approved |
|
Italy/Netherlands |
|
Not applicable |
|
No |
|
Yes |
|
ATAustria |
BEBelgium |
BGBulgaria |
CYCyprus |
CZCzech Republic |
DEGermany |
DKDenmark |
EEEstonia |
ELGreece |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
ESSpain |
FIFinland |
FRFrance |
HRCroatia |
HUHungary |
IEIreland |
ITItaly |
LTLithuania |
LULuxembourg |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
LVLatvia |
MTMalta |
NLNetherlands |
PLPoland |
PTPortugal |
RORomania |
SESweden |
SISlovenia |
SKSlovakia |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
ISIceland |
NONorway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
No |
|
Fungicide |
|
Micro-organism |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Natural |
|
Inhibits fungal pathogen development and activates plants immune system. Has curative and preventative properties. |
|
A common bacterium found in both soil and water, the strain was originally isolated from a soil sample collected from Micronesia, 1998 |
|
Crop protection; Nurseries pest control; Forestry; Landscape management |
|
Moulds; Mildews; Blights; Rusts and Phytophthora ramorum which is the oomycete that causes sudden oak death syndrome |
|
Many food and non-food crops; Trees; Ornamentals |
|
Suitable for use in all farming systems where approved for use in that country |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
006485 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Bacillus pumilus strain QST 2808 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
BM02 |
|
- |
|
Bacterium |
|
|
|
Current |
|
1998, first isolated |
|
|
|
- QRD 288
- Sonata ASO
- Ballad Plus
|
|
Usually supplied as a wettable powder or aqueous suspension that is applied as a foliar spray |
|
Commercial production of Bacillus species typically involves large-scale aerobic fermentation. The process begins with selecting a robust strain, often genetically optimised for yield and stability. These bacteria are cultivated in bioreactors under tightly controlled conditions, temperature (usually 30–37 degrees C), pH (neutral to slightly alkaline), and oxygen levels are carefully regulated to maximise growth and productivity. Nutrient-rich media, often containing glucose or other carbon sources, support rapid biomass accumulation. After fermentation, the culture is harvested, and the desired products, such as enzymes or spores, are extracted and purified. |
|
As microbial-based biopesticide production processes tend to use fermentation-based production rather than chemical synthesis, have a lower fossil fuel input in formulation and active ingredient creation, and have reduced downstream emissions due to biodegradability and minimal soil disruption, the life-cycle GHG emissions are expected to be low. Whilst hard and precise data are not available, broad estimates suggest that typically emissions are likely to be below 5 kg CO₂e/kg. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. |
|
- |
Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
None
Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
|
> 4.1 x 1009 |
Rat as CFU animal⁻¹ |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
> 7.0 x 1010 |
Unknown species as CFU/kg BW/day |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
> 2.1 x 1012 |
as CFU/kg dry soil |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
Non-toxic |
No adverse effects identified or expected |
Non-toxic |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
3.5 x 1014 |
Aphidius rhopalosiphi |
Low |
|
3.5 x 1014 |
Typhlodromus pyri |
Low |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
- |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
6.2 x 1008 |
Daphnia magna as CFU/L 21 day |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
> 1.2 x 1009 |
Lemna gibba as CFU/L |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
HUMAN HEALTH AND PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable |
- |
- |
|
> 4.1 x 1009 |
Rat as CFU animal⁻¹ |
- |
|
1.6E+08 |
Rat as CFU animal⁻¹ |
- |
|
> 1.6E+08 |
Rat as CFU animal⁻¹ |
- |
|
Intravenous LD₅₀ > 7.1E+08 CFU kg⁻¹ BW |
|
- |
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
No risk expected |
|
No risk expected |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
Carcinogen |
|
Endocrine disruptor |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
A0 A = Chromosome aberration (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; B0 B = DNA damage/repair (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; C0 C = Gene mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; D0 D = Genome mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; E3 E = Unspecified genotoxicity type (miscellaneous data source) 3 = Negative |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
Reproduction / development effects |
Acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor |
Neurotoxicant |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
Respiratory tract irritant |
Skin irritant |
Skin sensitiser |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
?Possibly, status not identified |
Eye irritant |
Phototoxicant |
  |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
No data found |
  |
|
|
Not expected to be harmful to humans |
|
|
|
Incompatible with strong oxidants, acids and alkais |
|
- |
|
Not listed (Not listed) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
Bacillus pumilus strain QST 2808 |
|
Bacillus pumilus |
|
Bacillus pumilus |
|
Bacillus pumilus |
|
Bacillus pumilus |
|
Bacillus pumilus |
|
Bacillus pumilus |
|
Bacillus pumilus |
|
Bacillus pumilus |
|
Bacillus pumilus |
|
Bacillus pumilus |
|
- |
Record last updated: |
25/08/2025 |
Contact: |
aeru@herts.ac.uk |
Please cite as: |
Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |