| Aluminium ammonium sulphate |

Last updated: 01/02/2026
|
 |
(Also known as: aluminium ammonium sulfate; ammonium alum) |
| Aluminium ammonium sulphate is used as a bird and animal repellent. It is highly soluble in water, non-volatile and non-persistent in soils. It is moderately toxic to mammals and a recognised irritant. It is relatively non-toxic to fish and aquatic invertebrates. |
The following Pesticide Hazard Tricolour (PHT) alerts are based on the data in the tables below. An absence of an alert does not imply the substance has no implications for human health, biodiversity or the environment but just that we do not have the data to form a judgement. The alerts for Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs) are based on applying the FAO/WHO (Type 1) and the PAN (Type II) criteria to PPDB data. Further details on the HHP indicators are given in the tables below. Neither the PHT nor the HHP hazard alerts take account of usage patterns or exposure, thus they do not represent risk.
| PHT: Environmental fate |
PHT: Ecotoxicity |
PHT: Human health |
Highly Hazardous Pesticide |
|
|
|
  |
|
|
An inorganic substance used as a bird and animal repellent |
|
|
Birds; Cats; Dogs; Rats; Possums; Rabbits |
|
|
Fruit; Ornamentals; Grassland; Row crops; Combinable crops - grains, oilseeds and pulses; Amenity areas |
|
|
Evaluated by extensive long-term use and pilot studies |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| EC Regulation 1107/2009 (repealing 91/414) |
|
|
Approved |
|
|
Ireland/Portugal |
|
|
31/01/2039 |
|
|
No |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
ATAustria |
BEBelgium |
BGBulgaria |
CYCyprus |
CZCzech Republic |
DEGermany |
DKDenmark |
EEEstonia |
ELGreece |
|   |
  |
✓ |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
ESSpain |
FIFinland |
FRFrance |
HRCroatia |
HUHungary |
IEIreland |
ITItaly |
LTLithuania |
LULuxembourg |
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
✓ |
  |
  |
  |
LVLatvia |
MTMalta |
NLNetherlands |
PLPoland |
PTPortugal |
RORomania |
SESweden |
SISlovenia |
SKSlovakia |
|   |
✓ |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
|
ISIceland |
NONorway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
NH₄AlS₂O₈ |
|
|
[NH4+].[O-]S(=O)(=O)[O-].[O-]S(=O)(=O)[O-].[Al+3] |
|
|
- |
|
|
LCQXXBOSCBRNNT-UHFFFAOYSA-K |
|
|
InChI=1S/Al.H3N.2H2O4S/c;;2*1-5(2,3)4/h;1H3;2*(H2,1,2,3,4)/q+3;;;/p-3 |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
Repellent; Rodenticide |
|
|
Inorganic compound |
|
|
>975 g kg⁻¹ |
|
|
EU dossier - none declared |
|
|
Natural |
|
|
Non-toxic mode of action - repellent by taste |
|
|
Aluminium ammonium sulphate occurs naturally in the earths crust and is present in some minerals including tschermigite |
|
|
Repellent |
|
|
Birds; Cats; Dogs; Rats; Possums; Rabbits |
|
|
Fruit; Ornamentals; Grassland; Row crops; Combinable crops - grains, oilseeds and pulses; Amenity areas |
|
|
- |
|
|
7784-26-1 |
|
|
7784-25-1 (dodecahydrate) |
|
|
232-055-3 |
|
|
840 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3032540 |
|
|
No data found |
|
|
237.15 |
|
|
aluminium ammonium sufate dodecahydrate |
|
|
aluminium ammonium sufate dodecahydrate |
|
|
aluminium ammonium sulfate dodecahydrate |
|
|
| UK Poisons List Order 1972 |
Rotterdam Convention |
Montreal Protocol |
|
|
|
| Stockholm Convention |
OSPAR |
EU Water Framework Directive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
- |
|
|
White crystalline powder |
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
First agricultural use undocumented; 1950s, recorded use as repellent |
|
|
- Sphere
- Chiltern
- Laronkarn Ltd
|
|
|
- Curb Crop Spray Powder
- Guardsman
- Scat
|
|
|
Available in a variety of formulations including wettable powders and liquids. |
|
|
The production of aluminium ammonium sulphate involves several key steps. First, high-quality raw materials, typically aluminium hydroxide, sulphuric acid, and ammonia, are prepared. Aluminium hydroxide reacts with sulphuric acid to form aluminium sulphate. This solution is then treated with ammonia under controlled temperature and pH conditions to produce aluminium ammonium sulphate. The resulting compound undergoes post-treatment steps including filtration, washing, and drying to ensure purity. |
|
|
Manufacturing aluminium ammonium sulphate generates GHG emissions primarily from its key components: aluminium and ammonium sulphate. Ammonium sulphate contributes relatively low emissions—around 0.05 kg CO₂e per kg—while aluminium is far more carbon-intensive, especially when produced from raw bauxite, emitting up to 16–20 kg CO₂e per kg. If the compound contains roughly equal parts of each, total emissions could range from about 8–10 kg CO₂e per kg when using primary aluminium, and as low as 0.5–1 kg CO₂e per kg if recycled aluminium is used. The actual footprint depends heavily on the production method and energy sources involved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10467 |
|
High |
|
|
10000 |
Heptane |
- |
| 10000 |
p-Xylene |
- |
| 10000 |
Ethyl acetate |
- |
| 10000 |
Acetone |
- |
|
|
94.5 |
|
- |
|
|
200 |
|
- |
|
|
87 |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
1.00 X 10-02 |
Calculated |
- |
|
|
-2.0 |
|
Low |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
1.64 |
Q2 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 2 = Unverified data of unknown source |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| - |
|
|
1.00 X 10-10 |
E2 E = Manufacturers safety data sheets 2 = Unverified data of unknown source |
Low volatility |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Not relevant |
|
- |
|
|
Not relevant |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Readily biodegradability |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Non-persistent |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Non-persistent |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Best available data. In unsterilised soil, substance is mineralized rapidly, and subsequently nitrified |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Fast |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. |
|
|
- |
| Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Non-mobile |
|
|
125000 |
|
|
Expert judgement |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
None
| Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 2000 |
Rat |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
33.5 |
Rat |
Moderate |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
> 1000 |
Eisenia foetida |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
> 100 |
Apis mellifera |
Low |
|
|
> 100 |
Apis mellifera |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| - |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| - |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
> 20000 |
R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications 4 = Verified data Aphidius rhopalosiphi |
Low |
|
|
> 20000 |
R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications 4 = Verified data Typhlodromus pyri |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 100 |
Oncorhynchus mykiss |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
> 100 |
Daphnia magna |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
23.23 |
Raphidocelis subcapitata |
Low |
|
|
1.15 |
Raphidocelis subcapitata |
Low |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| Regulatory Threshold Levels (RTLs) used to calculate Total Applied Toxicity (TAT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
Worst case of acute and chronic mammals |
|
|
No data |
No data for acute and chronic birds |
|
|
200 |
Worst case of acute and chronic earthworms |
|
|
No data |
No data for non-target plants vegetative vigour and seedling emergence |
|
|
2 |
Worst case of contact and oral honeybees |
|
|
10000 |
Worst case of parasitic wasps and predatory mites |
|
|
1 |
Worst case of temperate acute and chronic fish |
|
|
1 |
Worst case of temperate acute and chronic aquatic invertebrates |
|
|
0.115 |
Worst case of free-floating plants, rooted plants, acute and chronic algae |
| HUMAN HEALTH AND PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High (class III) |
- |
- |
|
|
> 2000 |
Rat |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
33.5 |
Rat |
Moderate |
|
|
> 2000 |
Rat |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
- |
|
|
0.001 |
SF=100 |
- |
|
|
0.01 |
|
- |
|
|
1.0 |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
Modest risk identified during the application period |
|
|
PPE/PPC recommended to reduce exposure |
|
|
Mainly eliminated via the urine |
|
- |
|
|
| Carcinogen |
|
Endocrine disruptor |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
A0 A = Chromosome aberration (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; B0 B = DNA damage/repair (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; C3 C = Gene mutation (EFSA database) 3 = Negative ; D0 D = Genome mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; E0 E = Unspecified genotoxicity type (miscellaneous data source) 0 = No data |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
| Reproduction / development effects |
Acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor |
Neurotoxicant |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
?Possibly, status not identified |
| Respiratory tract irritant |
Skin irritant |
Skin sensitiser |
✓Yes, known to cause a problem |
?Possibly, status not identified |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
| Eye irritant |
Phototoxicant |
  |
?Possibly, status not identified |
No data found |
  |
|
|
|
Harmful if swallowed Irritant to respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts |
|
|
|
|
|
Not explosive or oxidising Not expected to auto-ignite; Not highly flammable |
|
|
Health: H315, H319, H335 Environment: H412 |
|
|
Not listed (Not listed) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
aluminium ammonium sulphate |
|
|
sulfate d'ammonium d'aluminium |
|
|
Aluminiumammoniumsulfat |
|
|
aluminiumammoniumsulfat |
|
|
solfato di alluminio e di ammonio |
|
|
sulfato del amonio del alumino |
|
|
- |
|
|
siarczan amonowo glinowy |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| Record last updated: |
01/02/2026 |
| Contact: |
aeru@herts.ac.uk |
| Please cite as: |
Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |
© Copyright University of Hertfordshire, 2006-2026. All Rights Reserved
Your use of this website and its various databases is subject to the terms detailed in the University of Hertfordshire’s copyright and IPR statement that can be found at
https://www.herts.ac.uk/about-us/legal.
In addition, your use of this website and its various databases is subject to the terms of this additional Copyright Statement and the database
Conditions of use document.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the content of this website and databases are owned and controlled by the University of Hertfordshire. Site content, including its selection and arrangement, is owned by the University of Hertfordshire and is protected by copyright and other laws.
Except as otherwise expressly permitted under copyright law or within the database Conditions of Use document, the content of this site may not be copied, reproduced, republished, downloaded, posted, broadcast or transmitted in any way without first obtaining the University of Hertfordshire’s written permission.
By using our databases the user is deemed to have agreed to comply with all of the terms and conditions as described above and within all relevant documentation.