| Bordeaux mixture |

Last updated: 13/02/2026
|
 |
(Also known as: Bordo mix; tricalcium tetracoppper sulphate) |
| Bordeaux mixture is a copper sulfate/lime complex fungicide which also has some bactericide properties. It has a low aqueous solubility and is not volatile. It is not persistent in soil systems but can be stable in water. It is moderately toxic to most fauna and flora. Its mammalian oral toxicity is low but it is a probable eye irritant. |
The following Pesticide Hazard Tricolour (PHT) alerts are based on the data in the tables below. An absence of an alert does not imply the substance has no implications for human health, biodiversity or the environment but just that we do not have the data to form a judgement. The alerts for Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs) are based on applying the FAO/WHO (Type 1) and the PAN (Type II) criteria to PPDB data. Further details on the HHP indicators are given in the tables below. Neither the PHT nor the HHP hazard alerts take account of usage patterns or exposure, thus they do not represent risk.
| PHT: Environmental fate |
PHT: Ecotoxicity |
PHT: Human health |
Highly Hazardous Pesticide |
|   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A copper sulfate/lime complex fungicide which also has some bactericide properties |
|
|
Downy mildew; Damping-off; Powdery mildew: Fire blight; Leaf curl; Blackspot |
|
|
Vines; Fruit including apples, pears, olives, peaches, nectarines; Walnuts; ornamentals including roses; Non-agricultural situations including domestic gardons and allotments |
|
|
Copper based products have been shown to be affective against many fungal pathogens in field trials. |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Approved |
|
|
31/12/2027 |
|
|
No data |
| EC Regulation 1107/2009 (repealing 91/414) |
|
|
Approved |
|
|
France/Germany |
|
|
30/06/2029 |
|
|
Yes - two 'Persistent-Bioaccumulative-Toxic' criteria |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
ATAustria |
BEBelgium |
BGBulgaria |
CYCyprus |
CZCzech Republic |
DEGermany |
DKDenmark |
EEEstonia |
ELGreece |
|   |
  |
  |
✓ |
  |
  |
  |
  |
✓ |
ESSpain |
FIFinland |
FRFrance |
HRCroatia |
HUHungary |
IEIreland |
ITItaly |
LTLithuania |
LULuxembourg |
|   |
  |
  |
  |
✓ |
  |
✓ |
  |
  |
LVLatvia |
MTMalta |
NLNetherlands |
PLPoland |
PTPortugal |
RORomania |
SESweden |
SISlovenia |
SKSlovakia |
|   |
✓ |
  |
  |
✓ |
✓ |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
|
ISIceland |
NONorway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
CuO₂H₂ + CaSO₄ |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
Fungicide; Other substance |
|
|
Bactericide |
|
|
Inorganic compound |
|
|
>257 g kg⁻¹ total copper |
|
|
EU 2018 dossier: May contain heavy metals including Pb, Cd, As, Ni, CO, Sb & Hg |
|
|
Semi-synthetic; Complex mixture |
|
|
Contact and protectant. Prevents fungal spore germination. |
|
|
Bordeaux mixture does not occur naturally but its components do in various minerals |
|
|
Bordeaux mixture is a 50:50% mixture of copper sulphate and hydrated lime. These react to form a suspension of copper hydroxide and calcium sulphate. Hence, the active ingredient is copper hydroxide. Commercial “technical‑grade” unreacted Bordeaux mixture typically contains about 27% copper (as elemental Cu) on a dry‑weight basis. Once reacted 100g of Bordeaux mixture would form approximated 41.5% copper hydroxide. |
|
|
Crop protection |
|
|
Downy mildew; Damping-off; Powdery mildew: Fire blight; Leaf curl; Blackspot |
|
|
Vines; Fruit including apples, pears, olives, peaches, nectarines; Walnuts; ornamentals including roses; Non-agricultural situations including domestic gardons and allotments |
|
|
- |
|
|
8011-63-0 |
|
|
1333-22-8 |
|
|
616-932-1 |
|
|
44.604 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
029-022-00-9 |
|
|
860.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
mix, with or without stabilising agents, of calcium hydroxide and copper(II) sulphate |
|
|
bordeaux mixture |
|
|
| UK Poisons List Order 1972 |
Rotterdam Convention |
Montreal Protocol |
|
|
|
| Stockholm Convention |
OSPAR |
EU Water Framework Directive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Yes [ R09 Rule 9: Pesticide active ingredients that have demonstrated a high aquatic toxicity (where acute ecotoxicity for fish, invertebrates or algae =< 0.1 mg l⁻¹) ] |
|
|
- |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
M01 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Blue-green fine powder which is a mixture of naturally occurring inorganic substances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
1885, introduced |
|
|
- Law Fertilisers
- AgriChem
- Adama
- Manica SpA
|
|
|
- Wetcol 3 Copper Fungicide
- Bordocop
- Bordoflow
- Comac Macuprax
- Tutor
|
|
|
Often supplied as a soluble concentrate but also available as concentrated suspensions, wettable dispersible granules and wettable powders. |
|
|
Bordeaux mixture is commercially produced by combining copper(II) sulphate and hydrated lime (calcium hydroxide) in water. This reaction creates a suspension of copper hydroxide and calcium sulphate. The process involves dissolving copper sulphate in water, slaking quicklime with water to create a lime slurry, and then carefully mixing the two solutions. |
|
|
Data on GHG emissions for the commercial production of Bordeaux mixture will vary significantly depending on the processes involved. Manica, a leading producer of Bordeaux mixture, has conducted a detailed carbon footprint and concluded that less than 1 kg of CO₂e per kg of finished product is emitted. This includes emissions from raw materials, transportation, production, and packaging. Notably, however, the company uses regenerated copper sourced 100% from Itay, which significantly reduces the environmental cost. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Low |
|
|
9.6 |
Toluene |
- |
| 9.8 |
Dichloromethane |
- |
| 9.8 |
n-Hexane |
- |
| 8.8 |
Acetone |
- |
|
|
400 |
|
- |
|
|
Decomposes before boiling |
|
- |
|
|
110 |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
2.75 X 1000 |
Calculated |
- |
|
|
0.44 |
|
Low |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
- |
| No dissociation |
|
|
3.40 X 10-10 |
at 25 °C |
Low volatility |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Acidic soln: 205nm=5923, 250nm=3119, 800nm=70, 290nm=520, 295nm=398 |
|
- |
|
|
68.9 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not biodegradable |
|
|
|
10000 |
|
Very persistent |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
EU 2018 dossier: No degradation expected |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Stable |
|
Stable |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Stable |
|
Stable |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. |
|
|
- |
| Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
None
| Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 2000 |
Rat |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
4.0 |
Rat 2-yr as copper |
Moderate |
|
|
> 616 |
Colinus virginianus as copper |
Moderate |
|
|
> 334.1 |
Colinus virginianus |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
> 195.5 |
|
Moderate |
|
|
< 15 |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source Eisenia foetida as copper |
Moderate |
|
|
Nitrogen mineralisation: No significant adverse effect Carbon mineralisation: No significant adverse effect |
Dose: 20 kg Cu/ha; 28 Day |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
> 25.2 |
Apis mellifera |
Moderate |
|
|
> 23.3 |
Apis mellifera |
Moderate |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| - |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| - |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
> 14700 |
Aphidius rhopalosiphi |
Low |
|
|
> 13200 |
Typhlodromus pyri |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.39 |
Oncorhynchus mykiss |
Moderate |
|
|
22.5 |
Oncorhynchus mykiss |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
1.87 |
Daphnia magna |
Moderate |
|
|
0.02 |
Daphnia magna |
Moderate |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
0.145 |
Lemna minor |
Moderate |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
0.041 |
Raphidocelis subcapitata |
Moderate |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| Regulatory Threshold Levels (RTLs) used to calculate Total Applied Toxicity (TAT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
Worst case of acute and chronic mammals |
|
|
61.6 |
Worst case of acute and chronic birds |
|
|
3 |
Worst case of acute and chronic earthworms |
|
|
No data |
No data for non-target plants vegetative vigour and seedling emergence |
|
|
0.466 |
Worst case of contact and oral honeybees |
|
|
6600 |
Worst case of parasitic wasps and predatory mites |
|
|
0.2139 |
Worst case of temperate acute and chronic fish |
|
|
0.002 |
Worst case of temperate acute and chronic aquatic invertebrates |
|
|
0.0041 |
Worst case of free-floating plants, rooted plants, acute and chronic algae |
| HUMAN HEALTH AND PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable |
- |
- |
|
|
> 2000 |
Rat |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
4.0 |
Rat 2-yr as copper |
Moderate |
|
|
> 2000 |
Rat |
- |
|
|
1.97 |
Rat 4 hr (whole body) |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
|
1-9 |
concentration dependent |
- |
|
|
List II |
- |
- |
|
|
|
Negligible risk to bystanders for proposed uses |
|
|
Acceptable risk to operators and workers for proposed uses with PPE/PPC |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
| Carcinogen |
|
Endocrine disruptor |
| No data found |
A0 A = Chromosome aberration (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; B0 B = DNA damage/repair (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; C3 C = Gene mutation (EFSA database) 3 = Negative ; D0 D = Genome mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; E3 E = Unspecified genotoxicity type (miscellaneous data source) 3 = Negative |
No data found |
| Reproduction / development effects |
Acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor |
Neurotoxicant |
| No data found |
No data found |
No data found |
| Respiratory tract irritant |
Skin irritant |
Skin sensitiser |
| No data found |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
| Eye irritant |
Phototoxicant |
  |
✓Yes, known to cause a problem |
No data found |
  |
|
|
|
No further information available |
|
|
|
|
|
Not explosive or oxidising Not expected to auto-ignite; Not highly flammable |
|
|
Health: H318, H332 |
|
|
II (Moderately hazardous) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Bordeaux mixture |
|
|
Bouillie bordelaise |
|
|
Bordeauxbrühe |
|
|
bordeauxvæske |
|
|
poltiglia bordolese |
|
|
cobre de sulfato tribeisico |
|
|
- |
|
|
mieszanina Bordeaux |
|
|
- |
|
|
Bordeau |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| Record last updated: |
13/02/2026 |
| Contact: |
aeru@herts.ac.uk |
| Please cite as: |
Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |
© Copyright University of Hertfordshire, 2006-2026. All Rights Reserved
Your use of this website and its various databases is subject to the terms detailed in the University of Hertfordshire’s copyright and IPR statement that can be found at
https://www.herts.ac.uk/about-us/legal.
In addition, your use of this website and its various databases is subject to the terms of this additional Copyright Statement and the database
Conditions of use document.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the content of this website and databases are owned and controlled by the University of Hertfordshire. Site content, including its selection and arrangement, is owned by the University of Hertfordshire and is protected by copyright and other laws.
Except as otherwise expressly permitted under copyright law or within the database Conditions of Use document, the content of this site may not be copied, reproduced, republished, downloaded, posted, broadcast or transmitted in any way without first obtaining the University of Hertfordshire’s written permission.
By using our databases the user is deemed to have agreed to comply with all of the terms and conditions as described above and within all relevant documentation.