Frontalin |

Last updated: 23/08/2025
|
 |
(Also known as: Beetle aggregation pheromone; Douglas fir beetle aggregation pheromone) |
The following alerts are based on the data in the tables below. An absence of an alert does not imply the substance has no implications for human health, biodiversity or the environment but just that we do not have the data to form a judgement. These hazard alerts do not take account of usage patterns or exposure, thus do not represent risk.
Environmental fate |
Ecotoxicity |
Human health |
  |
|
|
|
A volatile substance used, often in mixtures with other compounds, as an attractant and lure for fir, spruce and pine beetles |
|
Douglas fir bark beetle (Dendroctonus pseudotsuga); Southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis); Spruce neetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) |
|
Fir; Pine; Spruce |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Not approved |
|
Not applicable |
|
No UK approval for use as a plant protection agent |
EC Regulation 1107/2009 (repealing 91/414) |
|
Not approved |
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
No |
|
ATAustria |
BEBelgium |
BGBulgaria |
CYCyprus |
CZCzech Republic |
DEGermany |
DKDenmark |
EEEstonia |
ELGreece |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
ESSpain |
FIFinland |
FRFrance |
HRCroatia |
HUHungary |
IEIreland |
ITItaly |
LTLithuania |
LULuxembourg |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
LVLatvia |
MTMalta |
NLNetherlands |
PLPoland |
PTPortugal |
RORomania |
SESweden |
SISlovenia |
SKSlovakia |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
ISIceland |
NONorway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
Frontalin is a chiral molecule with two asymmetric centres. |
|
C₈H₁₄O₂ |
|
CC12CCCC(O1)(OC2)C |
|
C[C@@]12CCC[C@@](O1)(OC2)C |
|
AZWKCIZRVUVZPX-JGVFFNPUSA-N |
|
InChI=1S/C8H14O2/c1-7-4-3-5-8(2,10-7)9-6-7/h3-6H2,1-2H3/t7-,8+/m0/s1 |
|
Yes |
|
Insecticide; Semiochemical |
|
Pheromone |
|
>95% |
|
- |
|
Natural |
|
Functions as an insect attractant - aggregation distruption |
|
One of several components isolated from the Douglas fir bark beetle (Dendroctonus pseudotsuga) and other Coleoptera beetles |
|
Forestry |
|
Douglas fir bark beetle (Dendroctonus pseudotsuga); Southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis); Spruce neetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) |
|
Fir; Pine; Spruce |
|
- |
|
28401-39-0 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
121201 |
|
- |
|
142.20 |
|
- |
|
(1S,5R)-1,5-dimethyl-6,8-dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octane |
|
(1S,5R)-1,5-dimethyl-6,8-dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octane |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
Not known |
|
Not applicable |
|
- |
|
Colourless to pale yellow liquid |
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
1969, report of first isolation |
|
- ChemTica
- Contech
- Forestry Distributing
- Cultivar agriculture
|
|
- Douglas Fir Beetle Tree Bait
- Mountain Pine Beetle Tree Bait
|
|
Usually supplied in slow release formulations and dispensers |
|
Frontalin is commercially produced through a stereoselective chemical synthesis due to its complex chiral structure. The process typically begins with a chiral auxiliary, such as 8-phenylmenthol esterified with pyruvic acid, which guides the formation of the desired enantiomer. Key steps include Grignard additions, oxidation with pyridinium dichromate, and ozonolysis followed by reductive work-up using dimethyl sulphide to yield either (+)- or (–)-frontalin, depending on the sequence of reagents used. This synthetic route allows for precise control over stereochemistry, which is critical since bark beetles respond selectively to specific enantiomers. |
|
While exact CO₂e values are not published for specific pheromones, some general information is available. The PHERA reported that biotechnological production (e.g. yeast fermentation) of pheromones can reduce GHG emissions by up to 90% compared to traditional chemical synthesis and GHG emissions are typically in the 5 to 10 kg CO₂e per kg of pheromone produced. Other sources suggest that small scale pheromone synthesis typically has emissions in the range 1 – 3 kg CO₂e per kg of pheromone produced. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. |
|
- |
Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
None
Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
|
> 1000 |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source Rat |
Moderate |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
> 2500 |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source No adverse effects identified or expected. |
Low |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
> 1000 |
Q2 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 2 = Unverified data of unknown source Expert judgement |
Low |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
> 100 |
Q2 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 2 = Unverified data of unknown source Expert judgement |
Low |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
> 100 |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source No adverse effects identified or expected. |
Low |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
> 100 |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source No adverse effects identified or expected. |
Low |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
HUMAN HEALTH AND PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High (class III) |
- |
- |
|
> 1000 |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source Rat |
Moderate |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
Carcinogen |
|
Endocrine disruptor |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
A0 A = Chromosome aberration (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; B0 B = DNA damage/repair (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; C0 C = Gene mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; D0 D = Genome mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; E3 E = Unspecified genotoxicity type (miscellaneous data source) 3 = Negative |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
Reproduction / development effects |
Acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor |
Neurotoxicant |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
Respiratory tract irritant |
Skin irritant |
Skin sensitiser |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
No data found |
Eye irritant |
Phototoxicant |
  |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
No data found |
  |
|
|
No adverse human health issues identified |
|
|
|
No information available |
|
- |
|
Not listed (Not listed) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
frontalin |
|
frontaline |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Record last updated: |
23/08/2025 |
Contact: |
aeru@herts.ac.uk |
Please cite as: |
Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |