Nerolidol |

Last updated: 23/08/2025
|
 |
(Also known as: peruviol; Spider mite alarm pheromone) |
The following alerts are based on the data in the tables below. An absence of an alert does not imply the substance has no implications for human health, biodiversity or the environment but just that we do not have the data to form a judgement. These hazard alerts do not take account of usage patterns or exposure, thus do not represent risk.
Environmental fate |
Ecotoxicity |
Human health |
  |
|
|
|
A naturally occurring substance that is a plant essential oil and also a component of the spider mite alarm pheromone |
|
Various mites including those of the eotetranychid, tetranychid and panonychid families |
|
Agricultrual, horticultural and ornamental crops |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Not approved |
|
Not applicable |
|
No UK approval for use as a plant protection agent |
EC Regulation 1107/2009 (repealing 91/414) |
|
Not approved |
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
No |
|
ATAustria |
BEBelgium |
BGBulgaria |
CYCyprus |
CZCzech Republic |
DEGermany |
DKDenmark |
EEEstonia |
ELGreece |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
ESSpain |
FIFinland |
FRFrance |
HRCroatia |
HUHungary |
IEIreland |
ITItaly |
LTLithuania |
LULuxembourg |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
LVLatvia |
MTMalta |
NLNetherlands |
PLPoland |
PTPortugal |
RORomania |
SESweden |
SISlovenia |
SKSlovakia |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
ISIceland |
NONorway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
Nerolidol exhibits geometrical and optical isomerism, resulting in four stereoisomers. These arise from two key features in its structure: a double bond at the 6-position, which can exist in either cis (Z) or trans (E) configuration, and a chiral centre at carbon 3, where the hydroxyl group is attached. The combination of these features leads to four distinct stereoisomers: (3R,6Z), (3S,6Z), (3R,6E), and (3S,6E). |
|
C₁₅H₂₆O |
|
CC(=CCCC(=CCCC(C)(C=C)O)C)C |
|
CC(=CCC/C(=C/CCC(C)(C=C)O)/C)C |
|
FQTLCLSUCSAZDY-SDNWHVSQSA-N |
|
InChI=1S/C15H26O/c1-6-15(5,16)12-8-11-14(4)10-7-9-13(2)3/h6,9,11,16H,1,7-8,10,12H2,2-5H3/b14-11+ |
|
Yes |
|
Insecticide; Semiochemical |
|
Pheromone; Plant-derived substance; Animal-derived substance |
|
>95% |
|
- |
|
Natural |
|
Acts as an insect repellent and attractant |
|
First isolated from certain plants including rose, citronella and lemon grass but more recently isolated from female spider mites |
|
Crop protection |
|
Various mites including those of the eotetranychid, tetranychid and panonychid families |
|
Agricultural, horticultural and ornamental crops |
|
Suitable for use in all farming systems where approved for use in that country |
|
7212-44-4 |
|
230-597-5 |
|
- |
|
128911 |
|
- |
|
222.37 |
|
- |
|
3,7,11-trimethyl-1,6,10-dodecatrien-3-ol |
|
3-hydroxy-3,7,11-trimethyl-1,6,10-dodecatriene |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
UNE |
|
Not applicable |
|
- |
|
Colourless to pale yellow clear oily liquid |
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
1987, first registered USA |
|
- Troy Biosciences
- DSM Nutritional Products AG
|
|
|
|
Usually supplied in slow release formulations that are used within pheromone dispensers |
|
Commercial production of nerolidol typically involves synthetic processes to meet industrial demand. One common method starts with linalool, which undergoes conversion to isopropyl acetate, followed by ethoxylation and hydrogenation reactions to yield nerolidol. |
|
While exact CO₂e values are not published for specific pheromones, some general information is available. The PHERA reported that biotechnological production (e.g. yeast fermentation) of pheromones can reduce GHG emissions by up to 90% compared to traditional chemical synthesis and GHG emissions are typically in the 5 to 10 kg CO₂e per kg of pheromone produced. Other sources suggest that small scale pheromone synthesis typically has emissions in the range 1 – 3 kg CO₂e per kg of pheromone produced. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
25 |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
2.14 X 1005 |
Calculated |
- |
|
5.33 |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source |
High |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
0.872 |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. |
|
- |
Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
None
Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
|
> 5000 |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source Rat |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
> 2000 |
Q2 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 2 = Unverified data of unknown source Unknown species |
Low |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
> 1000 |
Q2 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 2 = Unverified data of unknown source Expert judgement |
Low |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
> 100 |
Q2 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 2 = Unverified data of unknown source Expert judgement |
Low |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
> 100 |
Q2 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 2 = Unverified data of unknown source Expert judgement |
Low |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
HUMAN HEALTH AND PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High (class III) |
- |
- |
|
> 5000 |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source Rat |
Low |
|
5000 |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source Rabbit |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
Carcinogen |
|
Endocrine disruptor |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
A0 A = Chromosome aberration (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; B0 B = DNA damage/repair (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; C0 C = Gene mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; D0 D = Genome mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; E3 E = Unspecified genotoxicity type (miscellaneous data source) 3 = Negative |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
Reproduction / development effects |
Acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor |
Neurotoxicant |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
Respiratory tract irritant |
Skin irritant |
Skin sensitiser |
?Possibly, status not identified |
✓Yes, known to cause a problem |
No data found |
Eye irritant |
Phototoxicant |
  |
✓Yes, known to cause a problem |
No data found |
  |
|
|
No adverse health issues identified |
|
|
|
No information available |
|
- |
|
Not listed (Not listed) |
|
Not regulated |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
nerolidol |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Record last updated: |
23/08/2025 |
Contact: |
aeru@herts.ac.uk |
Please cite as: |
Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |