Erythromycin |
![]() Last updated: 12/09/2025 |
![]() |
(Also known as: EES; abomacetin; abomacetin; erythromycin A) |
|
![]() |
|
A macrolide antibiotic produced by Streptomyces erythreus and used in veterinary medicine | |
---|---|---|
|
Used to treat a range of bacterial infections including mastitis, pneumonia, tick-borne infections like Lyme Disease, sinus infections, wound infections, skin infections, bone infections, and certain other types of bacterial infections | |
|
Poultry; Cattle; Sheep; Pigs |
Approval status |
|
Approved - usually available as a prescription only medicine to be authorised by a veterinarian (POM-V) | |
---|---|---|
|
Approved |
Chemical structure |
|
Erythromycin exhibits stereoisomerism, primarily due to its complex macrolide structure, which includes multiple chiral centres and sugar moieties. The molecule contains a 14-membered lactone ring with several asymmetric carbon atoms, leading to the possibility of different stereoisomers that can influence its biological activity. Additionally, erythromycin can undergo epimerisation under acidic conditions, particularly at the C-6 position, which may reduce its antimicrobial efficacy and contribute to gastrointestinal side effects. Some derivatives and analogs of erythromycin, such as clarithromycin and azithromycin, are chemically modified to stabilise these stereocentres and improve pharmacokinetics. The optically active isomers of erythromycin have also been explored to separate desirable antibiotic effects from unwanted actions like cardiac side effects. | |
---|---|---|
|
C₃₇H₆₇NO₁₃ | |
|
CCC1C(C(C(C(=O)C(CC(C(C(C(C(C(=O)O1)C)OC2CC(C(C(O2)C)O)(C)OC)C)OC3C(C(CC(O3)C)N(C)C)O)(C)O)C)C)O)(C)O | |
|
CC[C@@H]1[C@@]([C@@H]([C@H](C(=O)[C@@H](C[C@@]([C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](C(=O)O1)C)O[C@@H]2C[C@@]([C@H]([C@@H](O2)C)O)(C)OC)C)O[C@H]3[C@@H]([C@H](C[C@H](O3)C)N(C)C)O)(C)O)C)C)O)(C)O | |
|
ULGZDMOVFRHVEP-UMCXFAKASA-N | |
|
InChI=1S/C37H67NO13/c1-14-25-37(10,45)30(41)20(4)27(39)18(2)16-35(8,44)32(51-34-28(40)24(38(11)12)15-19(3)47-34)21(5)29(22(6)33(43)49-25)50-26-17-36(9,46-13)31(42)23(7)48-26/h18-26,28-32,34,40-42,44-45H,14-17H2,1-13H3/t18-,19+,20+,21+,22-,23+,24-,25-,26+,28+,29+,30-,31+,32-,34-,35-,36-,37-/m1/s1 | |
|
Yes |
|
![]() |
Common Name | Relationship | Link |
---|---|---|
erythromycin B trihydrate | Variant | ![]() |
erythromycin A dihydrate | Variant | ![]() |
erythromycin B dihydrate | Variant | ![]() |
erythromycin A | - | ![]() |
General status |
|
Antibiotic, Antibacterial, Antimicrobial, Medicinal drug | |
---|---|---|
|
Macrolide | |
|
- | |
|
FAO: N-demethyl-erythromycin A; anhydroerythromycin A; erythromycin A enol ether; pseudoerythromycin A enol ether, erythromycin E, erythromycin F | |
|
Natural | |
|
Inhibits protein synthesis which is the basis of this antimicrobial action | |
|
[3S rRNA, Antagonist], [50S ribosomal protein L22, Antagonist], [50S ribosomal protein L4, Antagonist] | |
|
114-07-8 | |
|
204-040-1 | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
Antiinfectants for systemic use: Antibacterials for intramammary use | |
|
QJ51FA01 | |
|
No | |
|
Allowed substance (Table 1: All food producing species) | |
|
733.93 | |
|
- | |
|
(3R,4S,5S,6R,7R,9R,11R,12R,13S,14R)-6-{[(2S,3R,4S,6R)-4-(dimethylamino)-3-hydroxy-6-methyloxan-2-yl]oxy}-14-ethyl-7,12,13-trihydroxy-4-{[(2R,4R,5S,6S)-5-hydroxy-4-methoxy-4,6-dimethyloxan-2-yl]oxy}-3,5,7,9,11,13-hexamethyl-1-oxacyclotetradecane-2,10-dione | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
White to slightly yellow crystalline solid, slightly hygroscopic | |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Current | |||
|
1952, first isolated; 1953, patented; 1968, first reviewed; 1981, first total synthesis of erythromycin A | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Available in enteric-coated tablets, slow-release capsules, oral suspensions, ophthalmic solutions, ointments, gels, and injections | |||
|
Erythromycin is produced through a microbial fermentation process using the bacterium Saccharopolyspora erythraea. The production begins with inoculum development, where the bacterial strain is cultivated under controlled conditions to ensure high yield. This is followed by submerged fermentation, typically in large bioreactors, where the bacteria are fed a nutrient-rich medium containing sources of carbon, nitrogen, and essential minerals. During fermentation, the bacteria biosynthesize erythromycin as a secondary metabolite. Once fermentation is complete, the antibiotic is extracted from the broth using solvent extraction techniques, then purified. Advanced processes may also involve catalytic steps, such as using cytochrome P450 enzymes to optimize conversion of precursors into the final macrolide structure. | |||
|
As microbial-based products tend to use fermentation-based production processes rather than chemical synthesis, they typically have a lower fossil fuel input in formulation and active ingredient creation, and also have reduced downstream emissions due to biodegradability and minimal soil disruption, their life-cycle GHG emissions are expected to be low. Whilst hard and precise data is not available, broad estimates suggest that typically emissions are likely to be below 5 kg CO₂e/kg. |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2000 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
High | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
135 | L3 L = Pesticide manuals and hard copy reference books / other sources resolidifies MP(2) = 1903 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
3.02 X 1002 | Calculated | - | |||||||
|
2.48 | F4 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 4 = Verified data |
Low | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
8.88 | R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications 4 = Verified data |
- | ||||||||
@ 25DegC | |||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
pH 6.3: 280nm | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- |
Degradation |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
64 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
Moderately persistent | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
USEPA data: >64 days in three soils - sandy clay loam, silty clay 7 silty loam | ||||||||||
|
11 | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) Temp and OM dependent data for sandy loam+cattle manure 20°C3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
63.0 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
Moderately persistent | |||||||
|
at pH5 DT₅₀ 0.8 days; at pH9 DT₅₀ 35 days | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. | ||||||||||
|
- |
Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
- | V1 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) 1 = Estimated data with little or no verification |
Slightly mobile | |||||||
|
570 | ||||||||||
|
Estimated | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- |
Fate indices |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.25 | Calculated | Transition state | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- | - |
Known soil and groundwater metabolites |
None
Other known metabolites |
|
|
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
des-N-methyl-erythromycin Note: Major metabolite; Pharmacologically active |
- | Humans (Liver) | - |
|
![]() |
Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
> 4600 | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | |||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - |
Aquatic ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
349 | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) Morone saxatilis3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
30.5 | R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications Daphnia magna4 = Verified data |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
0.25 | R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications Daphnia magna4 = Verified data |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
> 0.11 | F4 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Ceriodaphnia dubia4 = Verified data |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 1000 | R3 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications Lemna gibba3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
0.02 | R3 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications Raphidocelis subcapitata3 = Unverified data of known source |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
0.01 | R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications Raphidocelis subcapitata4 = Verified data |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - |
|
- | - | - | |||
|
- | - | - |
|
![]() |
General |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
High (class III) | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 4600 | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
Subcutaneous LD₅₀ = 427 mg kg⁻¹ | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
Intravenous LD₅₀ = 426 mg kg⁻¹ | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) Mouse3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | |||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | |||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
Largely (~95%) metabolised by the liver and excreted in the bile and to lesser extent the urine | F4 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 4 = Verified data |
- |
Health issues |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May cause diarrhoea, nausea, abdominal pain, and vomiting Reported cases of hearing impairment Kidney, liver and lungs toxicant |
Handling issues |
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
No information available | |||
|
- | |||
|
Not listed (Not listed) | |||
|
- | |||
|
- | |||
|
- |
|
![]() |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|
|
erythromycin | ||
|
erythromycine | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
eritromicina | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- |
Record last updated: | 12/09/2025 |
Contact: | aeru@herts.ac.uk |
Please cite as: | Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |